Why we grade programme types and not individual colleges
There are nearly three thousand institutions on the register. We can defend a judgement about routes. We cannot defend three thousand judgements about names.
There are nearly three thousand institutions on the register. We can defend a judgement about routes. We cannot defend three thousand judgements about names.
Our sister site grades management routes — open university MBA, private university MBA, PGDM, PG diploma, mini MBA — on six weighted criteria. It does not grade named institutions, and the question we get asked most is why not.
Because we have no defensible basis for it. Grading a specific college requires data on its teaching, its outcomes and its current intake that we do not have and cannot verify at scale.
Publishing invented grades about real organisations would be dishonest, and unfair to them.
Structural differences. An open university online MBA and a private university online MBA differ in predictable, describable ways — in what is awarded, what it costs, what teaching comes with it, and which rule applies to it. Those are gradeable.
We are paid by institutions when a student enrols through us. That is precisely why the grades are about categories rather than about the institutions who might pay us. A grading system that could be bought would be worth nothing to you, and we would rather have the site be worth something.
Below a certain price the differences are real. Above it, you are buying teaching and a cohort — not recognition. Almost nobody says which one they are selling you.
RecognitionIt is not technically false. It is just answering a different question from the one you asked.
ProductsA twelve-week course borrowing the name of a two-year degree. Sometimes genuinely useful. Never the thing its name implies.